The Leo Frank Hoax: Interview With the NOI Research Group

Interview With the NOI Research Group:

The Jewish Hoax of Leo Frank

The emergence of Donald Trump after the contentious 2016 presidential election has heightened racial rhetoric and tensions in America. The controversies over the national anthem, the police shootings of unarmed Blacks, and the Civil War monuments have forced a reexamination of the history of racial oppression in America.

Jewish people were particularly incensed by the protesters who displayed Nazi symbols and chanted “Jews will not replace us.” Within the angst-filled Jewish commentary a largely unfamiliar name was invoked over and over. That name was Leo Frank—a Jewish B’nai B’rith leader who was lynched in 1915 for the murder of a young Gentile girl, a crime his supporters say he did not commit. A Black man, Jews say, was the real murderer, and they present Frank as a Jewish martyr who paid the ultimate price as a victim of white racism and bigotry. Frank’s killing is considered by Jews to be “the worst case of anti-Semitism” in America’s history.

But a new book by the Nation of Islam probes the Leo Frank case and casts serious doubt on that century-old Jewish point of view. NOI researchers say the commonly believed story of Leo Frank is based on falsified data, cunning propaganda, and outright deception, and has little at all to do with the known facts of the case. Further, that falsified Jewish history is being dishonestly used by Jewish leaders for political and racial advantage. We sat down with the researchers of The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, Vol. 3, subtitled “Leo Frank Case: The Lynching of a Guilty Man,” to learn more about this largely unknown case.

Describe for us the murder and how it developed into such an explosive case.

Leo Frank managed a pencil factory in Atlanta, Georgia, and he was also the president of the southern regional chapter of B’nai B’rith, the most prominent Jewish secret society. Thirteen-year-old Mary Phagan was one of about 120 child laborers working in the factory. She operated a machine that attached the metal band that holds the rubber eraser to the wooden pencil. 

On Saturday April 26, 1913, when the factory was deserted, the little girl came to the office of Leo Frank to get her pay of $1.20. In very much the same way as Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein is accused of doing, Frank used his power as the factory boss to lure her to a back area and attempt to sexually assault her. Mary resisted and in the struggle Frank struck her and knocked her unconscious, and then strangled her to death. He left a trail of clues leading to himself, so within a few days of the murder he was arrested. He was later tried, convicted, and ultimately sentenced to death. After two years of legal appeals Frank was kidnapped from his Georgia prison cell and lynched. He is claimed to be the only Jew ever lynched in America.

Jews also claimed that somebody else committed the crime and that Frank was unfairly tried and that he was the victim of “anti-Semitism.” The case became an international cause célèbre for Jews—as infamous as the O.J. Simpson case. And just as with the O.J. case the story of Leo Frank has immense racial overtones.

You mentioned Harvey Weinstein—his method of targeting young girls seems chillingly similar to the Leo Frank scenario.

Very much so. Frank found himself in the identical predicament that Weinstein is in. According to testimony at his 1913 murder trial, many of Leo Frank’s own female employees testified about how he had tried to corner them and about how he had proposed sexual acts to them. One by one these teenagers took the witness stand and spoke of his lewd behavior. One employee said he had looked through a keyhole to find Frank performing oral sex on a woman—right in the factory! Another said Frank had offered her money for sex. The testimony was so explicit that the judge had to clear the courtroom of women. What’s worse, after this barrage of salacious stories, Frank’s lawyers argued that his behavior was not wrong—that it was a sign of more liberal times! One even said, “Deliver me from one of these prudish fellows that never looks at a girl and never puts his hands on her…” Another telling similarity between Harvey Weinstein and Leo Frank is that all the girls that Frank hunted down were all Gentiles, and that caused much resentment among the white men of Georgia. Weinstein, at least so far, seems to have adopted that familiar M.O. in his targeting of young women.

What does the case have to do with Black people?

The Leo Frank case is much like the Plessy-Ferguson or Dred Scott case is to Black people—it is a pillar of Jewish identity. And from the very beginning of this landmark Jewish case, Blacks were intimately involved. At first, Jews said a Black night watchman at the factory named Newt Lee was the real murderer. He was arrested and almost lynched, until he was found to have an iron-clad alibi. Then the Jews said that the real murderer was another employee, a Black man named James Conley, who was a sweeper at the factory.

The night watchman you mentioned, Newt Lee—how was he implicated in the case?

Newt Lee was working that night and in the early morning, during his rounds, it was Lee who found the body in the basement. He alerted the police and they—seeing a Black man near a dead white body—immediately arrested him. Incredibly, Frank’s own legal team actually planted a bloody shirt at Newt Lee’s home to make him look guilty. At the same time Lee’s factory time card, which gave him a strong alibi, was mysteriously altered to show that he had had the time to commit the crime. Only Frank and his crew of lawyers and hired detectives had the ability to frame Newt Lee like that. When the newspaper reported that a bloody shirt was found at Lee’s home, it almost got an innocent man lynched. Luckily for Lee, Frank’s legal eagles and private eyes did such a sloppy job at planting the shirt that the police were not fooled at all and suspected Frank even more. This is the point in the case where the people of Atlanta came to believe—and rightly so—that Leo Frank was the murderer.

Tell us more about James Conley. What is his involvement in the Leo Frank case?

James Conley was the most pivotal individual in the whole case. He was a 29-year-old Black man and a janitor at the pencil factory, and the Jews say he essentially teamed up with Atlanta, Georgia’s white police and white prosecutors to falsely charge and condemn his employer, Leo Frank. For a century Conley has been portrayed as an enemy of the Jewish people—maybe the first “Black anti-Semite.”

James Conley, falsely charged with the murder of a white gentile girl.

And because there is a Black man in the midst of such a historical Jewish tragedy, it was incumbent upon us to ferret out the truth of the matter. Was Conley a murderer, or was he being set up to take the fall for Leo Frank’s crime? Black scholars—up until now—have left Conley hanging, as it were. He is owed a fair analysis. Is he the first “Black Anti-Semite” or an innocent victim of a Jewish smear campaign?

How did James Conley go from factory janitor to “black anti-Semite”?

Conley says that on the day of the murder Frank ordered him to be a lookout stationed on the first floor as Frank—a married man—“Weinsteined” young females in his second-floor office. Conley said that he had performed that lookout service for Frank several times before, so he was well familiar with the assignment. When an unsuspecting Mary Phagan came in that day to get her pay, she went upstairs to her boss’s office not knowing she was walking into Frank’s trap.

Moments later Frank called Conley upstairs in a panic, explaining that he had accidently struck and killed the girl. Frank then ordered him to help him conceal the body in the basement and swore him to secrecy. As a Black man in 1913 lynch-mob Georgia, Conley did as he was told. But as the case became a front-page sensation, Conley came to believe that Leo Frank was about to scrap their agreement and pin the murder on him. So Conley confessed to the police about his role in helping Frank conceal the body.

His statement was so detailed and the details matched the physical evidence, and thus Conley became one of the strongest witnesses against Leo Frank. It must be noted that a grand jury with five Jewish members (including at least two from Frank’s own synagogue) indicted Leo Frank before Conley came forward. So the evidence clearly pointed to Frank’s guilt before Conley said a word. But once Conley spoke up, Frank and his legal team—and Jewish leaders and scholars for the last 100 years—have used every bit of their wealth, power, and clout to pin the murder of Mary Phagan on the Black man James Conley.

Why is the Nation of Islam interested in this case, a Jewish case?

Leo Frank, the only Jew ever lynched in American history. He murdered a 13-year-old white gentile girl and tried to blame his crime on two Black men.

When studying the historical relationship between Blacks and Jews, we find that the 1913-1915 Leo Frank case is a turning point—a watershed moment. It is claimed that Leo Frank’s lynching caused Jews to feel more sympathy for the oppressed condition of Blacks in America. They say it compelled Jews to join the Civil Rights Movement and caused them to form the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith (ADL). They say it led to the rebirth of the Ku Klux Klan as an “anti-Jewish” organization.

In fact, none of that is true. But what IS true is that the Leo Frank case is the first use of “Black anti-Semitism” as a Jewish battle cry, and it marks the beginning of a hundred-year campaign by Jewish leaders to aggressively control and curtail Black progress. Jews insist that Blacks ignore the lengthy history of Blacks and Jews prior to the case and begin our relationship with them at the moment of Frank’s lynching in 1915—when we presumably were “united” in this tragedy. And if you examine the literature on the Black–Jewish relationship, it most often begins right at the very point of the Leo Frank case—as if nothing of historical significance preceded it.

Also, Leo Frank was not of the rank-and-file Jewish citizenry. As the B’nai B’rith president he was arguably the most important Jew in the South. Jews considered him as having, in effect, diplomatic immunity within the white rulership of the Jim Crow South, so his arrest, trial, and conviction shocked, offended, and activated Jews at the highest level. And they have sought to exonerate Frank ever since, but at Black people’s expense.

How did all the propaganda affect your approach to this case?

Our first view of the Leo Frank case accepted the prevailing opinion of Jewish scholars that Frank was innocent and wrongly convicted of murder, but there were red flags about how the case was being presented. We had to wade through reams of propaganda in order to get to the raw data, the primary documents. But once we did, it became clear that not only was Frank guilty of the rape and murder of Mary Phagan, but he and his Jewish defenders had taken anti-Black racism to an entirely new level.

There is no real doubt that Frank murdered Mary Phagan. Four separate investigative agencies—including the two detective firms hired by Leo Frank himself—concluded that Frank was guilty of the murder. A grand jury with five Jewish members indicted him. At least two of those Jewish men were members of Frank’s synagogue and one of them was a B’nai B’rith official! A 12-man jury of his fellow white men needed only a couple of hours to reach a unanimous guilty verdict. Once Blacks and whites decide to examine the ample evidence in the case, the conclusion that Frank was guilty is unavoidable.

What makes the Leo Frank trial problematic for Blacks?

Jews worked hard to pin the murder on two separate Black men. And then the Jewish leaders argued publicly and openly that (1) testimony from witnesses was invalid if they were Black, and that (2) Frank was innocent because murder and rape were “negro crimes.” Had the Jews succeeded in establishing those profoundly racist legal doctrines, crimes in America from then on would have been color-coded, and Blacks would be considered legally incapable of telling the truth! The fact that it was the Jewish community that advanced this wickedness makes the Leo Frank case a landmark case and irreversibly alters our understanding of the Black–Jewish relationship. 

Atlanta Constitution newspaper headline. Frank declared murder a “negro crime” and thus pronounced himself innocent.

Plus, the conduct of the trial by Frank’s defense was appalling. During jury selection Frank’s attorneys eliminated all the Blacks because they wanted to have an all-white jury; they attacked Blacks in open court, calling them “niggers” and “smelly” and “liars.” Frank’s attorney said that if you “hang a nigger in a hopper he’ll drip lies.” He asked one witness if he “ever smelled a nigger.” He told the court that they had “never known of a nigger” to leave sausage on a plate. Frank’s attorneys said that unlike the Jews Blacks were “a law-breaking race.”

Their defense appealed almost entirely to the “racial responsibility” of the all-white jury to exonerate a fellow white man. It is a testament to the sheer power of Jews that they were able to take a trial that may have been the most atrocious example of anti-Black race hate in the American judicial system and turn it into their most egregious example of anti-Semitism. Now Leo Frank is even being promoted as a Jewish civil rights icon, even though pure white supremacy was his courtroom defense! Yes, the Leo Frank trial was and is problematic for Blacks.

Was there a cover-up in this case?

A whole lot is being covered up in this case. Most people who have heard of the case have been told that Frank was in effect dragged out of a synagogue and tried at a Klan rally. But that was not the case at all. Frank, after all, was a prominent white man and a respected community leader in Atlanta—and he was treated as such by the police, prosecutors, and press. Jews in the South were honored members of the white community. They helped create the court system that enforced the legal inferiority of all Blacks. They never, ever had to face the racism that Blacks suffered.

Most people are not being told that there was blood and hair evidence, that Frank changed his alibi several times and lied constantly to police, that he was a womanizer who sexually harassed his girl employees, and that he claimed he couldn’t remember simple things. He hired private detectives that went around planting evidence and bribing witnesses to change their testimony. At his own trial Frank refused to be sworn on the Bible. Yes, there is a LOT that Jewish writers have covered up about the case, including Frank playing the race card to play to the white jurors’ prejudices about Black men. Most damning of all are the racist extremes that Frank and his B’nai B’rith associates were willing to go to free Leo Frank.

How did the Nation of Islam Research Group become aware of the Leo Frank Case?

Since at least 1959, Jewish leaders have targeted the Nation of Islam for destruction. And since 1983, Jews in America have ill-advisedly attacked The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan, labeling him an “anti-Semite,” and they have unleashed a barrage of hatred and slander against The Minister and ALL Blacks who love and respect him. Minister Farrakhan’s response was to send his scholars into the libraries to examine the actual history of Jews and their historical behavior with respect to Black people, and it is an ugly picture indeed. Their extensive involvement in the trans-Atlantic slave trade and the marketing of the products of slavery was documented for the first time, as was their deep involvement in the Jim Crow South. When The Minister published this secret history in 1991 and again in 2010, it shocked most Blacks and Jews.

The reaction of Jewish leaders was to deny, deny, deny—but ironically most of the scholarship used by the NOI had come from Jewish historians, rabbis, and Jewish leaders themselves. We only quoted high-ranking and well-respected scholars like Korn, Wiznitzer, Marcus, Raphael, Brackman and others who had documented horrible truths about Jewish slave-trading, but had only shared that knowledge among themselves.

Even with that damning historical evidence, Jewish leaders insisted that the Nation of Islam was misleading the world. Blacks, they said, ought to look at the Leo Frank case as the BEST example of the plight of Jews in America. And it is they who demand that Blacks view Jewish history through the prism of Leo Frank.

And so we respected that Jewish request and performed the most extensive analysis of the case ever done. But the result is an even more devastating a blow to the propaganda that passes for Jewish history. In 536 pages, we show that most of what is believed about the case is a carefully crafted lie.

What makes the Leo Frank case relevant today? Why should anyone care about this case, this history?

The Leo Frank case marks the spot in Jewish history where they in effect weaponized the charge “anti-Semitism” to punish and destroy their enemies. It is the point when Jews moved to commandeer Black leadership to make Blacks serve Jews’ political purposes. The Messenger of Allah, The Most Honorable Elijah Muhammad, says that in effect the civil rights movement was foisted upon us and is really a “hypocritical trick,” used to deceive us and defer our movement toward a full and complete freedom. The Leo Frank case is one of those tricks.

For example, Leo Frank’s crime happened at a very significant time for American Jews. The Federal Reserve was being established, as was the ADL. Both the Ku Klux Klan and the civil rights movement developed with the great assistance of Jews. So the Leo Frank case offered a chance to generate a victim-of-“anti-Semitism” storyline as cover for these other moves they were making at the time.

Was anti-Semitism involved in the Leo Frank Case? If so, how so?

Incredibly, this case is seen as the most egregious case of anti-Semitism in the history of America. Yet the records prove that anti-Semitism was almost entirely absent from the trial and its aftermath. The first time religion was introduced into the trial was through the bigotry of Frank’s own mother. She made a nuisance of herself at the trial, even standing up and cussing out the prosecutor, calling him a “Christian dog.”

We document at least three cases where Leo Frank hired people to incite “anti-Semitism” in his trial so that he could “play the anti-Semitism card” in his effort to free himself. So flagrant is this deception that we must ask how and why it has been allowed to stand for so long. It only proves that Blacks must examine history for themselves, no matter how strongly held the prevailing opinion and dogma may be. How the case has long been spun proves that some of the greatest liars in world history are historians—promoters of the Western world’s fairy tales.

When we Googled Leo Frank we found that he is being constantly referenced in articles and commentaries on today’s issues. Why are today’s Jews so passionate about the Leo Frank Case?

The Leo Frank case allowed Jews to reinvent and redefine themselves in America. Before the Frank case Jews were firmly a part of the slave-trading class of racial oppressors in a society that scapegoated Blacks and accepted the Jewish people as fellow Caucasians. Leo Frank gave them a chance to wipe that slate clean and start over in a biblical role as an American victim—the “despised and rejected” (Isaiah 53:3) for 400 years in a land not their own (Genesis 15:13).

You can’t be a slave-trading white supremacist people and maintain your image as God’s “Chosen.” So Leo Frank as a victim of a brutal lynching allows Jews to claim that the Jewish people as a whole were victims, rather than the victimizers that history proves they actually were. That is why most popular histories ignore the Jewish role in America between Columbus’s voyage in 1492 and the Civil War and Reconstruction of the mid- and late 1800s. They have hidden that history and demanded that we begin noticing the Jewish presence in America in the 1910s. In very much the same way that Jesus started time over again, Leo Frank the martyred hero allows Jews to claim that their American birth certificate reads August 17, 1915—the day Frank was lynched.

The case has been made into a play titled Parade, which seems to be performed all over the world.

Alfred Uhry, playwright and promoter of the Leo Frank hoax.

A society’s founding fables must be constantly reinforced if its citizens are going to react according to the wishes of its rulers. The Parade script provides that reinforcement for Jews. It is written by Alfred Uhry, the same Jewish man who wrote that unwatchable slavery nostalgia movie Driving Miss Daisy. Even in the three-word title, Uhry gives you the Black man’s job and function—a driver—without a reference to his humanity or even to his name. He is a servant to the more important Jewish woman, “Miss Daisy,” who has both a name and a respectful title. This is how Hollywood has misrepresented us, and, again, reinforced racial relationships. Uhry won a Tony for Parade because it tells Jews that they are the primary victims of America, and that Blacks are among their oppressors. He falsely represents James Conley as the murderer of Mary Phagan and he portrays Blacks as having aligned with whites specifically to persecute “the Jew.” Absurd.

Alfred Uhry’s claim to fame: Driving Miss Daisy. Considered to be a prime example of Hollywood’s demeaning racist roles.

Plays have to be examined, just like the Confederate statues. The ADL started out looking at plays, movies, books to ferret out and eliminate the defamation of Jews—it is in their founding charter. So those old movies have to go. Hamilton has to be reassessed. Over time, Black actors—much like the NFL’s Black athletes—will refuse these demeaning negro roles and “take a knee,” as it were. This would force Jews to play those demeaning roles in burnt-cork blackface—just like they used to. Parade defames Black people and cannot be allowed to stand.

 What do you think Alfred Uhry’s motive was?

Parade play is the main source of false Leo Frank propaganda.

Parade is a Jewish fairy tale—no more truthful than the story of Santa Claus or Washington’s cherry tree. In a sense Alfred Uhry does us a service, because Blacks must know how the theater and movies have been manipulated by Jews to effectively scapegoat our people. Parade demonstrates just how far they will go to make Blacks the villains. Leo Frank pointed his crooked finger at two Black men, which almost led to their lynching. He also accused a white Gentile man of the crime, and Frank’s team of thugs tried to hire a Black woman to poison the main Black witness. The lengths they went to free Leo Frank were beyond belief. None of Frank’s criminal acts make it into the Parade fairy tale.

In fact, Parade uses precisely the same formula as the 1915 film The Birth of a Nation, which told the world that Blacks were a lethal threat to American civilization. It should come as no surprise that Jews were the financiers, promoters, and distributors of that movie, which is so racist that it is still used by the Ku Klux Klan as a recruitment film.

How many other books written about this case? Any movies? The NOI’s book would make a fantastic movie!

There are about a dozen books and hundreds of articles on the Leo Frank case—nearly all of them following the racist Jewish storyline of an innocent Leo Frank who paid the ultimate price for a rape and murder committed by a Black man. A TV movie with Jack Lemon and Charles Dutton was produced in 1988, and a PBS “docudrama,” The People v. Leo Frank, was made in 2009. A movie that corrects the history and that tells the story of those who purposely twisted the case would make a very powerful feature film.

We’ve always understood that the Jewish people were the “best friends” of Blacks throughout our history. How did we get it so wrong?

If we examine the origin of Black people’s belief that Jews were our friends and allies in our freedom struggles, we find they use the Myth of Leo Frank as their “proof.” Until the Nation of Islam’s books on the Black–Jewish relationship, Black scholars have not dared to look carefully into that claim. Unfortunately, they have allowed Jewish scholars to simply invent a false history and bum rush it into all our history books.

For instance, in many books on lynching Leo Frank is the only person named as a victim, even though more than 4,000 Blacks were brutally lynched in America! And just like that, Leo Frank—a white man—is made the symbol of American racial terrorism. In some books the KKK is made into an anti-Jewish phenomenon and racism is merely an afterthought to the Klan—even though no other Jews were ever lynched. Through the Leo Frank case, Jews have simply stolen our history—like Jacob stole the birthright of his brother Esau in the Bible. They’ve swapped their photo for ours and used our I.D.s, to the point that we, Blacks, have been duped into believing a false history. As Malcolm X once famously said, “we’ve been took, hoodwinked, bamboozled.”

What is most striking about the case is how every aspect of the Jewish community rallied around Leo Frank—from the rank and file with their letter-writing campaigns to the upper echelon of Jewish leadership. Their persistence is to be admired, even though the hard evidence clearly shows Leo Frank to be as guilty as sin.

Yes. For them it was not about his guilt or innocence but in pushing a “cover” narrative that Jews can use to advance their own political and economic agenda. It is a narrative that helps them stick together as a people and—even more important—it runs interference as they pursue their political and economic agendas. It is now clear that most Jewish leaders and supporters may have known that Frank was the murderer of Mary Phagan. But their mangling of BLACK history is unacceptable. For Frank to be innocent a Black man must be guilty—and that is unacceptable.

It is also fascinating how Jews and white Gentiles seem to have split over this case.

Yes. This case marks the point where Jews turned most viciously against white Gentiles. The Jewish people had been so well accepted in the South by the Gentiles that some Jews actually believed that Dixie was the Jewish Promised Land. It was in the South where Jews had made an incredible fortune in cotton and slavery. So white Gentiles were completely blind-sided by this Jewish scorched-earth effort to free Leo Frank at all costs. Jews even slandered the whole state of Georgia with the charge of “anti-Semitism,” which, we found, was non-existent; indeed, our research shows just the opposite: Southern whites have always been philo-Semitic.

For instance, nearly all the previous writings on the case claim that a white mob stormed the trial chanting, “Hang the Jew or we’ll hang you!” In many books and articles these are the only words quoted in the whole case. Yet, there was no mob! There was no chanting! Frank partisans simply made it all up. We have a section in the book that lists all the authors that published some version of that lie, including the ADL, the Southern Poverty Law Center, the lawyer Alan Dershowitz, and newspapers like the New York Times, Los Angeles Times and many, many others.

That ONE SINGLE LIE is what Jews have pointed to for over a century to prove that they faced violent oppression in America. Yet it has no basis in fact at all. Quite remarkable.

Your use of primary documents makes this book groundbreaking—was it difficult in your research to access the original sources?

The original documents of the Leo Frank case are really an unexplored treasure trove that unlock the most confidential operations of the Jews’ highest leadership circles. As the Jewish leaders fought to free Leo Frank, a considerable amount of data about their private activities poured into the public record—information that is so extensive and so revealing that its very existence is unique in the annals of Jewish history. In much the same way as the slave-sale advertisements in our book Jews Selling Blacks unmask Jewish slave-dealing in the harshest way, so too does the Leo Frank case offer a unique window into the thinking and strategizing of the leaders of the Jewish people.

We examined the newspaper accounts, court records and filings, interviews, private investigators’ reports, and Jewish leaders’ private correspondence. Plus, we accessed a significant amount of information held in private archives and libraries, material that previous authors and researchers missed or purposely ignored. All of that is uncovered in the book.

The Nation of Islam goes against the scholarly grain in its revelations about the case—any backlash?

We expect that there will be much Jewish objection, but there is not much that can be disputed, given that the book’s thesis is supported so strongly by official documents and legal records. It is unlikely Jewish leaders will like seeing this history exposed. The Jewish newspaper Forward published an article this summer in which it interviewed Boston University professor Dr. Jeffrey Melnick. He is author of a book about the Leo Frank case, Black–Jewish Relations on Trial. He begins his interview with a surprising admission: “I’m clearly in a strange position of agreeing with a lot of what the Nation of Islam has to say…” In fact, Dr. Melnick was asked directly whether he felt Frank was really guilty. He answered, “I studied all I could and I can’t figure it out still.” Dr. Melnick still has his job, and yet we are still “anti-Semites”! Ironically, Jews falsely throwing around the “anti-Semitism” charge all started with the Leo Frank case.

Our book is so detailed and our range of source material is so extensive that Jews have “chosen” to sit this one out, and they cannot find a negro to push out front to repudiate it. Just as with the two previous volumes of The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews series, Jewish historians have shown that they are not equipped to deal with scholarship at this level. The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan demands intelligence and accuracy and, above all, TRUTH. While Jewish leaders were viciously slandering him, The Minister sent his scholars into the libraries—not into the gutter. Had we responded from the gutter, it would have been how traditional academia trained us. Min. Farrakhan gave us the intellectual weaponry to prevail in our research.

For those who are already students of the case, what does the Nation of Islam say in the book that is new?

We really bring an entirely new approach to the case. For instance:

  • We show how Frank’s lawyers maneuvered to force “anti-Semitism” into the courtroom where none existed.
  • There were two mysterious notes left next to the body that were written by the murderer. We hired a handwriting expert to analyze the notes and we found many clues that lead right to Leo Frank.
  • We chronicle how the national Jewish leaders took over the case, concocted a public relations campaign filled with racist lies and slander—with the Jewish-owned New York Times at the helm—and foisted it onto the public.
  • We analyzed Frank’s trial defense, which was explicitly racist and openly anti-Black.
  • We look deeply into the shady motives behind Governor John Slaton’s commutation of Frank’s death sentence.
  • We examined in detail not only the dubious pardon that the state of Georgia gave Leo Frank in 1986 but also the dubious claims of Alonzo Mann, who came forward after 70 years of silence to say he saw Conley with the body of Mary Phagan. It turns out that his new statements hurt Leo Frank far more than they help him.
  • We look at the illegal actions of Frank’s hired private eyes, who intimidated witnesses, planted evidence, and even hatched a murder plot against James Conley.
  • We look into the Jewish leaders who came to Frank’s defense and their real motives for taking on this case and a man they knew was guilty.
  • We looked into the group who is claimed to have lynched Leo Frank—The Knights of Mary Phagan—and uncovered some very strange and suspicious details that raise questions about who actually lynched the man.
  • We found that Frank’s stay in prison was almost luxurious—not the “anti-Semitic” nightmare that has been claimed.

Our goal was to introduce the case to a new generation who are more and more interested in this so-called Black–Jewish relationship and how it has affected Black progress. And to do that effectively we had to get to the bottom of who killed Mary Phagan. Was the murderer a Black man or a Jew?

It is only a matter of time before the falsehoods and lies that we have uncovered change the history of the Leo Frank case—and thus the Black–Jewish relationship—forever.

You seem to be saying that Leo Frank may not have been lynched by white gentiles at all…?

We believe that it is still a mystery who actually lynched Leo Frank. Nearly every account of Frank’s lynching says that a vigilante group called the Knights of Mary Phagan committed the act. But beyond a single mention of this group in the New York Times two months before the lynching, no record exists of this group anywhere. The Times was owned by a Jewish southerner named Adolph Ochs, who had actually joined the Leo Frank propaganda campaign. So the so-called Knights of Mary Phagan may have been planted to make a Gentile group take the fall for a lynching that was very likely committed by Jews themselves.

That may seem outrageous, but by the time of his lynching many people—including his Jewish supporters—came to believe Leo Frank was better dead than alive. Frank had such an offensive personality that his main Jewish supporter said that when he first met Frank, he impressed him as “a sexual pervert.” Think about that: Leo Frank was that repellant to his friends and advocates at his very first meeting with them! The man was Albert Lasker and he paid millions (in today’s money) for Frank’s defense, but he privately admitted that he was not even convinced that Frank was innocent. Frank’s repulsive personality just did not jibe with the angelic international image Frank’s public relations team had created for him—that of a humble, innocent, and suffering Jesus figure. That whitewashed image of the man conflicted with the actual character of the man and so, by the time of his lynching in August of 1915, the man himself had outlived his usefulness.

A measure of how expendable Leo Frank was to the Jewish community might be gleaned from his gravesite in New York. It is a remarkably tiny and non-descript headstone for someone who is considered a beloved Jewish martyr. Aside from that, Frank was a president of the B’nai B’rith. One would think that someone who had reached his level of significance would be honored by a grave as magisterial as those surrounding his. We think that it is a sign of Jewish contempt for the man himself. But Frank’s image—as manufactured as it is—lives on.

Are there any surviving members of the Frank family? How do they feel about the NOI’s recent book on the case?

Aside from his wife, Lucille Frank, and mother, there were no other immediate family members involved in the trial. Frank was buried in Brooklyn, where he grew up, and nothing more was heard from his family since.

His victim, Mary Phagan, has relatives who have taken up her cause. They have always believed that Frank was guilty. Interestingly, Mary’s grand niece was named after her—Mary Phagan Kean. As a young girl herself, she learned of the tragedy and began her own quest for the truth. Ms. Kean wrote a book published in 1987 titled The Murder of Little Mary Phagan and she, like us, examined the official records of the case. She concluded that Leo Frank was her great aunt’s murderer. We would venture that the Phagan family might appreciate the detail we have brought to our case analysis. At least we hope they would.


Thank you!

More NOIRG articles on the Leo Frank Myth:






Note: The Secret Relationship Between Blacks & Jews Series can be purchased here: 

The Jewish Assault On Black Thinkers

Pulitzer Prize-winning author Alice Walker

Richard Cohen and the Antisemitism Industry Attack Alice Walker

Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen’s attack on Alice Walker, the Pulitzer Prize-winning writer, scholar, activist, and poet, exposes a repugnant Jewish mindset, one that our great athlete Lebron James just called a “slave master mentality.”

Lebron was speaking of the overwhelmingly Jewish owners of the NBA and the NFL, who—just as in slavery—force their intelligent, grown Black men into utter silence on social, economic, and political issues. This “relationship” exists in the literary world, where Blacks are policed by the likes of Richard Cohen, Alan Dershowitz, and that den of spies the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith.

Having no respect for Ms. Walker at all, massa Cohen is outraged that she has chosen to read a book by David Icke, and that she stated her choice of reading material publicly in a New York Times interview. Cohen, good citizen that he is, is reminding his fellow overseers at the Times of the Jim Crow law his own Jewish ancestors helped put into effect in 1833:

If any person shall teach any slave, negro
or free person of colour to read or write
either written or printed characters, or
shall procure, suffer or permit a slave, negro,
or person of colour to transact business
for him in writing, such person so offending
shall be guilty of a misdemeanor,
and, on conviction, shall be punished by
fine, or imprisonment in the common jail,
or both, at the discretion of the court.

True to the beloved slave-master model, Cohen won’t even dialogue directly with Alice Walker or her fans and admirers. To him, the respected author does not possess the capacity to analyze Icke’s writings and place them in proper perspective—namely, a Jewish perspective. Instead, Cohen addresses his complaint about Walker’s unlawful literacy to his New York Times brethren, whom he upbraids for not applying the whip with enough gusto.

These Jewish overseers have created a truly untenable dilemma. What if she had said she was reading Philip Roth, Margaret Mitchell, Norman Mailer or Saul Bellow, all of whom have been accused of racism in their writings? Would Cohen have been so quick to lead his Inquisition? Great American writers Mark Twain, H.L. Mencken, Toni Morrison, and James Baldwin have all been tarred by the Jews as “anti-Semites”—what shall we do with their writings? During his eight years President Barack Obama was besieged by Jewish accusations that he was “anti-Semitic,” with one Jewish newspaper publisher openly advocating that the Israeli Mossad assassinate him! What if Alice Walker had Obama’s Dreams From My Father on her nightstand? How about the writings of other American presidents, Mr. Cohen? Jefferson enslaved 200 Black human beings, Monroe, 75, Washington, 350, Madison, 106, and Hamilton also bought and sold Black Africans. So, no more civics classes (or Broadway plays) in all of America? Shall we burn ALL the books and writings of those prominent Americans in one great bonfire at the Washington Post under grand wizard Cohen?

The weaponization of the “anti-Semitism” charge has long ago passed into the realm of the bizarre. And their propensity to target Blacks of renown, Jewish leaders have learned, is most profitable, because it cynically exploits a latent Jewish racism that has always existed just below their liberal façade. It also allows them to keep the idea of Jewish “victimhood” front and center in the news without upsetting those whites with the power to counter-attack. But the “anti-Semitism” industry’s growing list of Black villains is as dangerous as it is absurd: Alice Walker? Toni Morrison? Mahatma Gandhi? Nelson Mandela? Desmond Tutu? Barack Obama? Martin Luther King? Oprah? The ADL, SPLC, and Simon Wiesenthal Center, with the prodigious assistance of Zionist imps like Alan Dershowitz and Richard Cohen, use these Black notables to frighten Jews and extort donations—the ADL now scamming annual revenues of $60 million.

Dr. Marc Lamont Hill

All Blacks would have to agree that Dr. Marc Lamont Hill’s recent presentation at the United Nations in support of Palestinian rights was incisive, scholarly, impassioned and impressively delivered. Even if one does not endorse his views on that subject, he proved that his voice is formidable. Jews in his home base of Philadelphia had a different take:

“The Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia strongly condemns hate speech in our community and throughout the world. When antiSemitic hate speech was expressed by Temple University Professor Marc Lamont Hill, we immediately took action with national and local partners. We have and will continue to condemn comments that reject the state of Israel and the Jewish connection to our homeland.” 

These Jewish groups abuse the “anti-Semitism” charge—even falsely inflating their statistics—in the very same way they abuse the memory of the Nazi Holocaust. Dr. Norman Finkelstein described this scheme in his book The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering, in a chapter he titles “THE DOUBLE SHAKEDOWN”:

Cloaking itself in the sanctimonious mantle of “needy Holocaust victims,” the Holocaust industry has sought to extort billions of dollars from these already impoverished countries. Pursuing this end with reckless and ruthless abandon, it has become the main fomenter of anti-Semitism in Europe.

Unfortunately, the mass of Jewish Americans has chosen to support these money-grubbing antisemitism peddlers—just as they did Jewish gangsters Arnold Rothstein, Bugsy Siegel, and Meyer Lansky—feigning ignorance of their crimes.

In speaking of the Jewish Holocaust and Black writers, Richard Cohen exposes the ugliest of Jewish double standards. What if Ms. Walker had said she had Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf on her reading list? No doubt, Cohen and crew would be apoplectic. As we all know, Mein Kampf is considered the very blueprint of anti-Jewish evil—the book that the Simon Wiesenthal Center calls “the basis for Hitler’s policies and for the Nazi genocide.” Yet, if one peruses the ADL website, one would find Mein Kampf with an introduction written by longtime ADL leader Abraham Foxman! The very same notorious head of that gaggle of spies who are determined to scapegoat every Black man and woman they cannot buy. The ADL’s excitement is palpable as it announces that Foxman’s Mein Kampf intro is “In response to a surge in digital downloads of e-book editions of Adolf Hitler’s biographical manifesto” and “in anticipation of the expiration of the book’s Bavarian copyright in 2015.”


Only silence from Richard Cohen, and from the Simon Wiesenthal Center, which has tried to force Hitler’s book off Ebay, Amazon, and the shelves of university libraries. Turkey’s foreign minister received a protest from the Wiesenthal censors for its sale in his country, but neither Foxman’s Mein Kampf nor the ADL’s promotion of it has generated any concern. Instead, we get front-page Jewish outrage over what is on Alice Walker’s nightstand!

Enough is enough. The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan is the very worst nightmare for these shadow-lurking “anti-Semitism” peddlers. He has called for an open and public Showdown with them to either prove their false charges or shut down their corrupt and deceitful Anti-Semitism Industry for good. It is only when those who profit from lies, confusion, and discord are fully exposed that an honest and truthful discourse about real issues can begin.

Joy Behar Unwittingly Exposes Jewish Slave Trading

‘Termite’ Is EXACTLY Right, part 2

(Read Part 1 here)

The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan’s speech in Detroit on October 14th was a powerful example of the pure divine power of a man presenting unexpurgated truth—whilst simultaneously exposing the open treachery of Allah’s open enemies and offering spiritual guidance to Allah’s chosen people. Since that 2 ½-hour lecture to a very warm and welcoming Detroit audience, the Jewish media have chosen to focus on but 17 words: “When they talk about Farrakhan, call me a hater, call me an anti-Semite—stop it: I’m anti-termite.”

It all centered around a tweet by Chelsea Clinton in which she expressed shock at what she claimed she heard The Minister say: she said, he “compared Jews to termites,” such a statement being both “dangerous and wrong.” And on the word and authority of the daughter of two washed-up politicians the media launched their latest anti-Black, anti-Farrakhan attack. The four-woman panel of ABC’s The View, led by comedian Joy Behar, launched into their own canned outrage.

So in the twinkling of an eye white women—who yesterday were enraged by the Brett Kavanaugh appointment to the Supreme Court—were using the false and deceptive claims of Chelsea Clinton to lead the anti-Farrakhan “termite” campaign. This is an important nuance that shines light on the behind-the-scenes ADL/Mossad operatives, who obviously compelled Clinton and the women of The View to make their racist attacks on the Minister and the Nation, and here is why. Listen again to The Minister’s speech in Detroit—it contained the most powerful affirmation of the woman’s role in the world that has ever been spoken by ANY public figure. In fact, many have said that the subtitle of The Minister’s Detroit lecture might well be, in his own words: “There’ll never be a change in the world until women rise…

The Minister spoke of how he reacted to the poignant words of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, who testified of the Supreme Court nominee that she alleges had tried to rape her:

When I saw that woman give her testimony…tears came in my eyes because no man should take from a woman what a woman does not want to give. And when that woman stood up and went through the horror of what Mr. Kavanaugh is alleged to have done to her, she had to relive it. That kind of experience, you don’t forget. It is seared into your memory. You may put it behind you and think it’s gone somewhere. But when you least expect it that thing will come out and make a problem for you.…

One of the worst things that a man can do is abuse a woman, take advantage of a woman….Women are Sacred. If you don’t see yourself as sacred, it’s because Satan has robbed you of the knowledge of who you are and ripped you off from your divine destiny.…I want you little sisters to listen. You’re not some cheap thing for men to use for pleasure and discard you. You’re the Woman of God. You make a future for us. We have no future except that future comes through a woman.…You are a Sacred Woman. Every prophet of God came from your womb. Every scientist, every great mind, every great man, every great woman came from your womb.…The Bible says a Virtuous Woman is more valuable than silver and gold. Sisters, you have to recognize your sacredness…

Imagine how the Jewish lies about Farrakhan would have crumbled had the women of the world (and The View) heard those words. This was a man who was in Detroit—for the second time—to honor Aretha Franklin and to eulogize her spiritual greatness: “Aretha was the Queen of Soul. Soul meaning the Essence of Our Being that comes directly from God.”

Such words of praise for women are unknown in this world, and so the ADL/Mossad schemed to have their “condemnation” of The Minister come from the mouths of women, who, to their dishonor, allowed themselves to be manipulated and used. Notice how the ADL/Mossad fake-news outlets used Chelsea Clinton as their mouthpiece and their tool:

Jewish Telegraph Agency: “Chelsea Clinton calls out Louis Farrakhan over anti-Semitism”

Newsmax: “Chelsea Clinton Slams Farrakhan for Comparing Jews to Termites”

The Forward: “Chelsea Clinton To Farrakhan: Jews Aren’t Termites”

The Tablet:“Finally, a first daughter brave enough to take on Farrakhan”

Haaretz: “Chelsea Clinton Says Enough Is Enough”

Pushing women out front to fight their battles—and Gentile women at that—is in clear and obvious contrast to the way of the Nation of Islam. Had The Minister’s words of exaltation been allowed to be broadcast uncensored, ALL women might see the glaring and unambiguous difference between The Minister’s championing of women’s rights, and the steely silence of the Jewish leadership as one Jewish man of power and influence after another, after another, and another is charged with Harvey Weinstein-like sexual abuse of women. As their Jewish holy book Talmud teaches, a Jewish man is obligated to say the following prayer every day: “Thank you God for not making me a heathen, a woman or a slave.” Chelsea Clinton and Joy Behar are both married to Jewish men.


Joy Behar & the Jews Who Owned Slaves

As part of her “anti-termite” rant Joy Behar made a profoundly ignorant statement on ABC’s The View that poses another problem for Jews altogether. She was referring to The Minister when she stated with certainty:

“I mean, what is his problem with Jews? The Jews did not own slaves—I don’t know what his issue is.”

When the ADL chose Behar to front for them, they did not expect her to introduce that crucial slavery caveat. For if the Jews did in fact “own slaves,” her “problem” would be with the JewsNOT with The Minister. To Joy Behar, the un-crossable line in the sand, the point of no return, the unredeemable evil, is Jewish slave-owning. According to Ms. Behar’s own beliefs, once it can be shown that Jews DID own slaves, the debate about Farrakhan and the Jews is settled, over and done with, decided for all time—in Farrakhan’s favor.

What if Ms. Behar and The View found that Jews not only owned slaves but also

  • owned, insured, and financed slave ships and outfitted those floating dungeons with chains and shackles for the Trans-Atlantic slave trade;
  • that Jews owned sugar, cotton, and tobacco plantations with thousands of Black slaves;
  • that when their slaves escaped, Jews tracked them down and murdered them, and cut off their hands to give to each other as trophies;
  • that Jews were slave auctioneers, brokers, and sellers of whole plantations—slaves and all;
  • that Jews became wealthy marketing all the products of forced Black slave labor;
  • that Jews placed advertisements in American newspapers to break up families and sell Black women and children?

Ad placed by slave-selling Rabbi Jacob Levin

Let us offer Ms. Behar and her co-hosts and the audience of The View the words of Jewish scholars and rabbis from the books they have written on the slave-owning history of Jews. For instance,

  • Dr. Arnold Wiznitzer described the early Jewish presence in Brazil, where 9 out of 10 enslaved Africans were shipped: “[Jews] dominated the slave trade…The buyers…at the auctions were almost always Jews, and because of this lack of competitors they could buy slaves at low prices.”
  • Dr. Harold Brackman wrote that during the 1600s “slave trading in Brazil became a ‘Jewish’ mercantile specialty in much the same way it had been in early medieval Europe.”
  • Dr. Jonathan Schorsch: “Jewish merchants routinely possessed enormous numbers of slaves temporarily before selling them off.” Jews became the major traders in “refuse slaves”—Africans who were weak and sick from the Middle Passage voyage. Jews bought them, “fattened them up,” and sold them at a profit.
  • The Jewish Encyclopedia adds that “Jewish commercial activity” in this time included a “monopoly of the slave trade.” If a slave auction fell on a Jewish holiday, it was postponed because of a lack of buyers and sellers!
  • Dr. Marcus Arkin wrote that in Surinam Jews used “many thousands” of Black slaves, and Jews gave their slave plantations Hebrew names such as Machanayim, Nachamu, and Goshen. The Jewish militias murdered escaped slaves and cut off their hands to award as trophies.
  • Rabbi Herbert I. Bloom added that the “slave trade was one of the most important Jewish activities …” In 1694, Jews owned 9,000 Africans, and by 1791 there were 100 “Jewish mulattoes” in Surinam—the result of the rape of African women by their Jewish enslavers.
  • Dr. Cecil Roth wrote that the slave revolts in parts of South America “were largely directed against [Jews], as being the greatest slave-holders of the region.” Jews set up militias with the sole purpose of fighting the Black Maroons, the escaped Africans who were fighting to free their enslaved brethren.

The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan is mis-labeled as “anti-Semitic” because he agrees with Jewish authorities such as these. His Jewish detractors are actually ignorant about what their own scholars have written on this very subject!

But wait—there is much, much more!

In the real estate now known as the United States,

  • Jews were twice as likely to be slave owners as the average Southerner.
  • American Jews sold slaves on layaway, providing slave-owners with the credit to buy Black men, women, and children.
  • American Jews were involved with slave-breeding, even “breeding” girls and women for sexual purposes.
  • Jews served as constables, sheriffs, and bounty hunters in the American slavocracy, imprisoning and punishing escaped Black Africans.
  • Thousands of American Jews fought for the Southern Confederacy.
  • Southern rabbis owned and rented slaves!
  • The Jewish Encyclopedia was clear: “[T]he cotton-plantations in many parts of the South were wholly in the hands of the Jews, and as a consequence slavery found its advocates among them.”

Rabbi and historian Rabbi Dr. Bertram Korn, the acknowledged expert on 19th-century Jews, wrote:

“It would seem to be realistic to conclude that any Jew who could afford to own slaves and had need for their services would do so….Jews participated in every aspect and process of the exploitation of the defenseless Blacks.”

In his 1983 book Jews and Judaism in the United States, Rabbi Dr. Marc Lee Raphael, the longtime editor of the most prestigious Jewish historical journal, wrote one of the more definitive statements on Jewish involvement in the Black Holocaust:

“Jewish merchants played a major role in the slave trade. In fact, in all the American colonies, whether French (Martinique), British, or Dutch, Jewish merchants frequently dominated…”

In New York—where both Ms. Behar and Ms. Clinton live and where The View is produced—the earliest European settlers decided to enter the slave trade, so, according to records, they contacted “the jobbers and the Jews” of Brazil, who were the recognized international slave dealers. Further, the largest shipments of Africans arriving in New York in the first half of the 18th century were commissioned by two Jewish slave traders!

Whites and Jews today must come to grips with the fact that the immense wealth generated by their brutal and wicked Black Holocaust over five centuries is absolutely the foundation on which all of western society exists. And it is the foundation of white supremacy—a system that cruelly continues to oppress the descendants of those millions of forgotten African slaves. Jews are the single wealthiest class of white Americans and their dominance in the slave trade accounts for that position.

Long, long before Joy Behar pointed out the economic significance of Jewish slave-trading to today’s race relations, The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan insisted that the discussion of Black–Jewish history take an intellectual tone. He has released nearly two-thousand pages of verifiable scholarship that is dedicated to shedding historical light on a subject that Jewish leadership has deliberately mired in ugly rhetoric, base name-calling, and rude deception. That light uncovers some extremely troubling realities about who and what have eaten away—like termites—at the Black man and woman’s social, economic, political, and spiritual foundations.

[Read Part 1 of this article here]


‘Termite’ Is EXACTLY Right, part 1

Turns Out that ‘Termite’ Is EXACTLY Right, part 1


Sura 114 – Say: I seek refuge in the Lord of men, The King of men, The God of men, From the evil of the whisperings of the slinking (devil), Who whispers into the hearts of men, From among the jinn and the men.

There couldn’t have been a more potent demonstration of rank ignorance than Joy Behar’s tour de force  statement on ABC’s The View. She was referring to The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan when she let fly this monstrous absurdity: “I mean, what is his problem with Jews? The Jews did not own slaves—I don’t know what his issue is.” Meghan McCain quickly added a “Yeah,” thus compounding the offense. They were both in a state of agitation over The Minister’s now famously upsetting but—it turns out—deadly accurate use of a metaphor when he said

When they talk about Farrakhan, call me a hater, call me an anti-Semite—stop it: I’m anti-termite. I don’t know anything about hating anyone because of their religious preference.

That statement stands alone as a response to the age-old nonsense that ALL Black leaders who criticize white and Jewish behavior are “haters” and “virulent anti-Semites.”  As we will see, not only is there plenty to criticize, but the utilization of the termite metaphor is so absurdly common in political discourse that one must ask the mischief makers: “Is that all you got?!”

The Minister himself has used the termite metaphor at least two times over his 60 years of divine service—both times are recorded in the Final Call — wherein he was referring to the corrosive effects of adultery and corruption. In neither case was he referring to the Jewish people or the Jewish religion; instead, he was describing a condition of the mind and heart.

It is important to note here that the very core Teachings of the Nation of Islam deal most powerfully with the condition of the human mind and heart. We are taught that the most significant categorization IS NOT a racial one, but a spiritual one. The Most Honorable Elijah Muhammad has said to The Minister: “Brother, the best religion is, ‘Do unto others as you would have others do unto you.’ When you look at all of the teachings of Jesus, you can boil it down to this basic principal, ‘Do unto others.’” One is either a believer in truth or a promoter of falsehood. It is as simple and as complex as God versus Satan. The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan has ALWAYS been dedicated to that principle. Indeed, in his very language in Detroit he was drawing this divine distinction: I am not anti-Semitic—I am ANTI-EXPLOITATION and a defender of my people against ALL who are exploiters. And just as with Jesus, his “hard teachings” have rankled many an exploiter’s feathers.

Minister Farrakhan was obviously and purposely misquoted by a wicked interpreter in order to feed the corrupted hearts of the increasingly desperate Jewish racists, who are only now coming to grips with a destructive and exploitative history that will be covered at length in Part 2 of this article. Their slanderous behavior has made them even more perfectly analogous to the nature and behavior of that little milky white creature, the termite.

Before we move on (in part 2) to debunk Joy Behar’s shocking historical ignorance about the Jews in the African slave trade, let us first clear out some embarrassing hypocrisy. The first to make an issue of The Minister’s self-defense was none other than Chelsea Clinton, the daughter of presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, who as senator referred to Blacks, the voting base of her Democrat party, as “super predators,” an insulting animalization of Blacks that lost her the election. Her racism was fueled by the wicked incarceration policies of her husband William, the 42nd president, who during his two terms in office put more Black men in prison than the combined presidencies of Reagan and Bush1. Chelsea, who was so anxious to begin her political career with a racist anti-Farrakhan tweet, has never tweeted about either of her parents’ capital crimes.

Meghan McCain’s only apparent claim to fame is that her father was the recently deceased Arizona senator John McCain, whose white supremacy she has inherited. During the 2000 presidential campaign the senator was asked by reporters why he continued to use the ugliest of racial slurs when referring to Asians: “I hate the gooks. I will hate them as long as I live…” His bigotry wasn’t limited to “gooks”:—he hated Blacks too: McCain supported the rescinding of Martin Luther King Day; he endorsed George Wallace, Jr., a favorite speaker among white supremacists; and he fought to keep the Confederate battle flag flying over South Carolina. Daughter Meghan—like Chelsea—has learned her race hate from the best.

Termites as Political Metaphor

Make no mistake, these women are being pimped from behind the scenes by the Anti-Defamation League/Mossad, which is determined to hide their own hate and racism by artificially creating “black racists,” inflating words, symbols, and signs over the Jews’ long, long, long history of anti-Black deeds. Today they use “termites,” a few months ago they used the 2005 photo of Obama with Minister Farrakhan, and for years their M.O. has been to fill the news with a fake record of recriminations that will stand in history as justification for his planned assassination. But each time the Jews plan (HQ 3:54), Allah—Who IS the Best of Planners—plans, and fewer and fewer people are swayed, and the Jews’ open deception is further exposed.

Frank Gaffney

The metaphorical use of termite has been deployed frequently throughout time. Richard Perle was the Jewish Neoconservative that is most responsible for the Machiavellian “War on Terror.” To prepare the world Perle sent out his Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense with anti-Muslim rhetoric like this: “They essentially, like termites, hollow out the structure of the civil society and other institutions for the purpose of creating conditions under which the jihad will succeed.” Frank Gaffney was not run off social media; he writes for the Washington Times and the Jewish World Review. You can find him here, tweeting filthily:

Spero News columnist Father Thomas Collins is a Catholic priest in Virginia who wrote in a similar vein about “The termites that are eating away at America’s soul,” and he assailed the promotion of abortion and sexual promiscuity and the destruction of family values.

Stephen Miller

Some of the most racist language and policies from the Trump administration are the work of a Jewish man named Stephen Miller, who according to Esquire magazine “Is Waging War on … America….from the shadows.” It is Miller who is credited with the policy of separating the families of illegal immigrants. Esquire describes Miller’s political tactics: “He’ll install allies in federal agencies to act as ‘termites,’ eating the structure from within to prevent it from providing services. That’s part of a larger effort to operate in the shadows.” Esquire’s intact account can be found here:

Going back a bit, the 1941 book Scum of the Earth, by the famed Jewish writer Arthur Koestler, contains a quote graphically describing the breakdown in French society after the Nazi takeover:

“…A planter enters his house after an absence of five or six days; everything is apparently as he left it, nothing seems changed. He sits down on a chair, it collapses. He grabs the table to regain his balance, it falls to pieces under his hands. He leans against the central pillar, which gives way and brings down the roof in a cloud of dust.”

Koestler is quoting from Maurice Maeterlinck’s Life of the Termites in order to establish in his readers’ minds a salient political point. Not only does Koestler find the termite to be the most accurate metaphor for society’s decay, but his other book, The Thirteenth Tribe, debunks the claim by the white Caucasian Ashkenazi Jews that they are Jews at all! His careful, scholarly, and historically accurate 1976 study found that the white people we think of as Jews—the Netanyahus, the Jonathan Greenblatts, the Alan Dershowitzes and the rest of them—are imposters with no genetic connection to the holy land or holy people of the Bible; they are not even Semites! Koestler proves that their Caucasian tribal ancestors converted to Judaism sometime in the 8th century. So the charge of “anti-Semitism” constantly leveled at Blacks and their leaders has no actual meaning at all.

The Southern Israelite, serving Jewish segregationists in the Jim Crow South, was using the “termites” metaphor to describe its enemies in a 1940 front-page article titled “Nazi Termites Fomenting Unrest; Press and Radio Subsidized.” It is an eerie foreshadowing of the racist scare campaign that the ADL is running at this very moment through social media.

Rabbi Leon Spitz

The American Hebrew magazine from 1946 followed suit, publishing an article by Rabbi Leon Spitz titled “Exterminate Anti-Semitic Termites As Our Ancestors Did 2,500 Years Ago,” in which he admits just in the title that Jews committed genocide—and he views this with pride.

In 2018, several “news” centers that now feign outrage at The Minister’s use of the word “termite” were using the very same metaphor in the very same way, with no adverse blowback of the Chelsea Clinton variety.

A veteran Environmental Protection Agency scientist profiled in the Washington Post described the Trump administration—or, as the Post called it, “the current regime”—in these words: “These people are like termites, gnawing at the foundation.” The WP Titter page remains unscathed:

David Cay Johnston

Earlier this year investigative reporter and Pulitzer Prize-winning author David Cay Johnston was promoting his new book, in which he makes the very same termites analogy. He has been interviewed and his book reviewed by a wide range of media outlets, including the New York Times, the Baltimore Sun, and Democracy Now, despite the Jewish publisher Simon & Schuster’s description of his book posted on

“Bestselling author and longtime Trump observer David Cay Johnston shines a light on the political termites who have infested our government under the Trump Administration, destroying it from within and compromising our jobs, safety, finances, and more.”

Both Johnston’s and Simon & Schuster’s Twitter accounts are going strong at: and

White conservative gadfly Michael Reagan, son of former President Ronald Reagan, tweeted his outrage at Minister Farrakhan’s Black use of the “termite” metaphor, attempting to shame Twitter for not “banning” him from its platform. But not too long ago Reagan had this to say about “liberals”:

“If you can think of the liberals, think of them as termites eating away at the foundations of your home each and every day….See, that’s what they do every day. See, we can’t afford to let them keep doing that…”

The man is still tweeting his hypocrisy at

Van Jones

Former Obama official and political analyst Van Jones took great pains to connect the federal government with “termites” wherever he appeared on the air. On CNN he said, “When you’ve got termites eating into every pillar of your government, that is a dangerous thing.”

Over and over, the use of the word termites in an obviously political context has been seen as a very apt and useful metaphor. Where was Chelsea Clinton when Fox News editorialized about her mother’s health right before the 2016 election:

“Before you purchase a house you inspect it for termites, before you purchase a car you look under the hood. Is it too much to ask for a health examination and report of all presidential candidates? I’m no doctor and I truly hope she is healthy but I believe the American people deserve to have Ms. Clinton’s full medical records open for examination.”

The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan has been pilloried for using the termite metaphor with laser accuracy. His extraordinary wisdom and his vast knowledge of world history have made him the most perceptive analyst on today’s racial and religious dynamics that have brought the world to the brink of extinction. When he speaks of this society and its racism using the metaphor of termites, it is best to stop, listen, and then think.

For those who chose to listen that day in Detroit, The Minister went on to describe in its ugly detail the exploitative and damaging nature of the Black–Jewish relationship that began on the slave ships of European Jewish merchants and continued in the Detroit city streets with the Jewish criminal narcotics mob known as the Purple Gang—all of whose crimes infested and ate away at Black life. Significantly, other scholars have made the very same point. University of Sussex Professor Clive Webb, Ph.D, is an expert in the field of Black–Jewish relations and wrote that the Jews traded in socially destructive commodities, such as beer, wine, and liquor. And in so doing, the Jewish merchants “were not so much providing the lifeblood of the black community, as injecting it with poison.”

Now, what insect does that sound like?

By the way, Dr. Webb is still tweeting at


Learn more about termites here:


Part 2: Joy Behar gets a Jewish slavery lesson.

Tamika Mallory, the  ADL, & the Hypocrisy of the Anti-Black Zionists!

Minister Farrakhan and Ms. Mallory.

For the past month, Women’s March Co-organizer Tamika Mallory has faced relentless criticism for doing what millions and millions of African-Americans have done for decades and generations of their lives: she attended a speech by Nation of Islam leader Minister Louis Farrakhan.

While speaking, Minister Farrakhan made remarks which have been criticized for being anti-Semitic by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL).  When asked about these statements, Ms. Mallory stated: “I think people have to ask Minister Farrakhan about his views. I’m not responsible for Minister Farrakhan, nor am I a spokesperson for him.” [1]

She continued by stating, “What I do know is that I’ve worked with Minister Farrakhan for many years to address some of the ills in the Black community, where we’ve transformed lives… In those areas we have been able to work together. As it relates to some of the statements he has made and some of his personal views, people have to ask him about that.” [2]

Organizations such as the ADL refused to accept this and took to Twitter and other social media to criticize not only Ms. Mallory but other Black leaders who would dare share the same breathing space as Minister Farrakhan.                                             

The ADL has further called for Ms. Mallory to resign from her position in the Women’s March. The ADL complains, ”Tamika Mallory, one of the leaders of the Women’s March, who got a special shout-out from Farrakhan and who regularly posts laudatory pictures of him on her Instagram account — as does Carmen Perez, another leader of the March.“ [3]

Yet, former ADL director Abe Foxman has appeared in several photographs smiling with Israeli prime minister Shimon Peres, a man who offered to sell apartheid South Africa a long-range missile called the burglar. [4]

Former ADL director Abe Foxman takes picture with Shimon Peres, who once advocated that Apartheid South Africa needed ”More Modern Weapons.”

After signing a defense agreement with apartheid South Africa in 1975, Peres proudly posed in a photograph with Hendrik Van Den Berg, who was known as the most feared man in South Africa due to his role in mass-murdering Black, anti-apartheid activists. [5]  

Why didn’t the ADL attack Peres with as much tenacity for taking a photo with Hendrik van den Bergh, as they did Ms. Mallory for uploading a photograph with Farrakhan?

Despite Peres appearing in a photo with a mass-murderer of Black people and his role in arming apartheid South Africa, the ADL once hosted a celebration where they provided Peres with the distinguished statesmen award, claiming Peres changed the world for the better. [6]

Foxman asserted, “Just think of the diverse contributions Shimon Peres has made to mankind.” [7] It would appear the ADL does not hold itself to the same standard it seeks to impose upon Ms. Mallory.  Foxman has also  shared platforms and taken photographs with former Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon, who believed that the racist white settlers in apartheid South Africa needed,”more modern weapons.” [8]  Was there any outcry about this appearance? No. 

 ADL’s role in Anti-Black Violence

In the Unspoken Alliance: Israel’s Secret Relationship with Apartheid South Africa, Sasha Polakow-Suransky writes: “As the anti-apartheid campaign turned its attention to Israeli links with South Africa, the ADL entered the propaganda fray, publically attacking Nelson Mandela’s ANC with arguments that mirrored those of hardline security officials in Pretoria.” [9]  Indeed, instead of repudiating Peres for signing a defense agreement with Apartheid South Africa, in 1986, the then national director of the ADL, Nathan Perlmutter, co-authored an article defending apartheid and South Africa’s President P.W. Botha, while denouncing Nelson Mandela’s African National Congress as “totalitarian, anti-humane, anti-democratic, anti-Israel and anti-American.” [10]  If the ADL had been aware of Nelson Mandela’s photograph with Minister Farrakhan, given their history, the ADL would have probably used that to call for Nelson Mandela to step down from his position. 

The ADL even dispatched spies throughout the United States to monitor groups working to end apartheid in South Africa. [11] Working as a spy for the ADL, Roy Bullock passed on data he collected on anti-apartheid activists to the racist intelligence agency of Apartheid South Africa. [12]

After this repugnant history, it’s absolutely absurd for the ADL to even posture as though it’s a credible civil rights organization when they have not  made any acknowledgment or amends with Black communities for their decision to support white murderous rule in apartheid South Africa.

The Israeli Defense Force vs the Nation of Islam

Whilst criticizing Ms. Mallory for associating with the NOI, the ADL in events such as “National Counter-Terrorism Seminar in Israel” [13] demonstrates it is more than willing to associate and even promote the Israeli defense force, an  organization that has a demonstrated track record of actual physical violence against Black people.

A 1984 U.N. report titled “Recent developments concerning relations between Israel and South Africa” states that the Israeli defense force’s “Collaboration with bantustans in military and police affairs is alarming because the racist regime of South Africa has utilized the bantustans as tools of oppression and suppression against the people of South Africa.” [14]

The Bantustans were systematically designed to confine the socio-economic mobility of Black people and ensure that Black people remained a permanent underclass and cheap labor source for white people. By any objective standard, the Israeli “defense”  force should be classified as a hate group for policing the bantustans of apartheid South Africa.

The ADL is upset that Ms. Mallory attended a Nation of Islam event, an organization whose members are forbidden to carry weapons—even a pen knife. In contrast, Peres provided apartheid South Africa with brutal weapons used to kill Black people.

A CIA memo titled ”Israel’s relationship with Apartheid South Africa” revealed that Israel under Peres’ leadership provided apartheid, South Africa with piloted reconnaissance drones, galil assault rifles, 155m howitzer kits, and the Israeli defense force provided technical assistance to modernize apartheid South Africa’s mirage 3 fighter aircraft. Israel also provided riot control equipment, including gas masks and tear gas training programs, to apartheid South Africa. [15] These weapons were utilized to kill Black people.

The Nation of Islam is currently characterized by the ADL as a “hate group,” despite a lack of history of actual hate crimes. In contrast, the Israeli defense force, whom the ADL is affiliated with, has a documented and undeniable history of facilitating state terrorism against Black people.

During the height of the struggle against apartheid in South Africa, Lekgau Mathabane, the head of Soweto’s Committee of Ten, an anti-apartheid civil rights organization, proclaimed: “A friend of the South Africa government cannot be a friend of the Black…. Israel also supplies arms to South Africa and South Africa uses those arms for killing Black people and even children three years old. You don’t  expect any Black person to be happy with that type of thing.” [16]

Why is it acceptable for Foxman to snap photos with Peres but a Ms. Mallory instagram post with Minister Farrakhan results in a national uproar? Given the anti-Black violence of the Israeli military, the ADL’s decision to promote the Israeli defense force is far worse and worthy of condemnation than Ms. Mallory’s decision to attend a Nation of Islam event.  

Anti-racist activist Tim Wise stated, “Perhaps when white folks begin to show as much concern for the bigoted statements and, more to the point, murderous actions of white political leaders as we show over the statements of Louis Farrakhan, then we’ll deserve to be taken seriously in this thing we call a ‘national dialogue on race’.” [17]

When Will the ADL condemn the Anti-Black Zionists?

Another immense double standard was revealed when Chief Rabbi of Israel Yitzhak Yosef referred to Black people as “Monkeys.” [18]  The characterization of Black people as monkeys is no light matter; it is rooted in Black people being portrayed as subhuman, and it is the very ideology that rationalized colonialism and the enslavement of Black people.

Yet the most the ADL did was issue a watered-down tweet claiming it was “racially charged,” as opposed to explicitly anti-Black. [19]  There were no calls for any particular individuals who were in the audience who attended the speech to resign from their places of employment. Moreover, the ADL has devoted a significantly larger amount of tweets indicting Minister Farrakhan, compared to one watered-down version condemnation of Rabbi Yitzhak. There was not even a call or pressure by the ADL to have Rabbi Yitzhak step down from his position as chief rabbi of Israel.

Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu with the Chief Rabbi of Israel who has called Black people ”monkeys.” When will the ADL pressure Netanyahu to resign for his association with a racist?

While Zionist Lobby groups have called for Senator Maxine Waters to resign for a video showing her warmly embracing Minister Farrakhan, there have been no calls for Netanyahu to step down as Israeli prime minister for photographs showing him shaking hands with the anti-Black rabbi, Yitzhak Yosef.

The reality of the Anti-Black Zionists

The anti-Black zionist groups such as the ADL place the state of Israel over Black lives. Given the ADL’s role in supporting apartheid in South Africa [20], it is not to be taken seriously as a civil rights organization. The ADL has no authority to tell Ms. Mallory or any other Black leader who they can associate with.  Instead of focusing on her decision to attend a speech by Minister Farrakhan and stalking her social media for Minister Farrakhan photos, the ADL should be seeking forgiveness and atonement from the Black community for their complicity in being anti-Black.


[The NOI Research Group thanks Brother Hakeem Muhammad for permission to publish this article. The original is posted here:]



[1] (2018). Women’s March Organizers Accused Of Anti-Semitism—Again. [online] Available at: [Accessed 29 Mar. 2018]. 

[2] IBID

[3]  “Women’s March Leaders Refuse to Condemn Farrakhan after Antisemitic Speec.” The Jerusalem Post |, 4 Mar. 2018,

[4] The Israeli Connection: Whom Israel Arms and why By Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi, pg. 63.

[5]   “The Tall Assassin Sparks New Interest in Apartheid Atrocities.” Penguin SA @ Sunday Times Books LIVE,

[6] Presentation of the ADL Distinguished Statesman Award to Shimon Peres.” Anti-Defamation League,

[7] IBID

[8] Middleton, Drew. “SOUTH AFRICA NEEDS MORE ARMS, ISRAELI SAYS.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 14 Dec. 1981, 

[9] Polakow-Suransky, Sasha. The Unspoken Alliance: Israel’s Secret Relationship With Apartheid South Africa. Vintage Books, 2011. 209 

[10] Polakow-Suransky, Sasha. The Unspoken Alliance: Israel’s Secret Relationship With Apartheid South Africa. Vintage Books, 2011. 234 

[11] Polakow-Suransky, Sasha. The Unspoken Alliance: Israel’s Secret Relationship With Apartheid South Africa. Vintage Books, 2011. 209

[12] IBID

[13] “National Counter-Terrorism Seminar in Israel.” Anti-Defamation League,

[14]   Special Reports of the Special Committee Against Apartheid: Recent developments concerning relations between Israel and South Africa.

[15]   Israel’s Relationship With South Africa,

[16] Polakow-Suransky, Sasha. The Unspoken Alliance: Israel’s Secret Relationship With Apartheid South Africa. Vintage Books, 2011. 187. 

[17] “Farrakhan Is Not the Problem: The Arrogance and Absurdity of America’s Racial Litmus Test.” Tim Wise, 24 Aug. 2010,

[18] Osborne, Samuel. “Israeli Chief Rabbi Calls Black People ‘Monkeys’.” The Independent, Independent Digital News and Media, 22 Mar. 2018,

[19] IBID

[20]  Polakow-Suransky, Sasha. The Unspoken Alliance: Israel’s Secret Relationship With Apartheid South Africa. Vintage Books, 2011. 209 

Congressman Rokita and Farrakhan

Indiana Republican Congressman Todd Rokita recently introduced a resolution condemning the Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan, the venerable leader of the Nation of Islam, the strongest and most independent organization in America serving the Black community and oppressed people around the world. Rokita—prompted by a cabal of sinister business and political activists primarily, but not exclusively, in the Republican establishment—has promoted a series of actions designed to discredit and demonize the strongest and most potent voice left in the Black community.

Rokita’s actions were stimulated by the more than three decades-old false charge of anti-Semitism leveled against Minister Farrakhan since 1984, when he rose to international prominence defending the Rev. Jesse Jackson in his quest to become the nation’s first Black president. Jackson, who himself was labeled an anti-Semite for his position on justice for the Palestinian people, had enlisted Farrakhan to promote his candidacy among the Black masses. Because of Farrakhan’s deeply embedded roots in the Black community, the combination of Jackson and Farrakhan ignited a spark in the Black community that shook the political establishment.

At the root of that political firestorm stood the Zionist leadership and their enablers in the ADL, backed by the leaders of the 12 most powerful Jewish organizations of America. Their anger was based on Farrakhan’s statement that not only exposed Israel as a racist settler state, having disenfranchised the Palestinians and sequestered them in a small part of their original homeland, but also revealed the Jewish control of Black politicians, entertainers, and athletes here in America.

Congressman Rokita, born in 1970, was at that time (1984), a political neophyte. He knew nothing then, nor does he know now, of the Honorable Minister Farrakhan’s expanding national and global prominence. Today, however, Rokita has emerged as a rightwing conservative Republican mouthpiece for President Trump and the anti-Black Jewish establishment in the “Party of Lincoln.” How ironic it is that Rokita is the mouthpiece for one of the most vile, racist demagogues ever to occupy the Oval Office, a man the Washington Post says has told more than 2,000 lies over the past year. Consider that, according to the Book of Proverbs, God “detests lying lips, but delights in those who tell the truth.” Yet Rokita seeks to pass a congressional resolution condemning a man who never lies, but is vilified for telling the truth and speaking truth to power. Rokita instead gives a pass to a man accused of a variety of sordid behaviors, ignoble activities, and outrageous policies. He has nothing but praise for a president who seemingly lacks morals, character, and ethics. But a man of faith and integrity he demonizes.

Rokita’s actions are sparked by the anger expressed by the Zionist community about a 2005 photograph that has recently emerged featuring Minister Farrakhan shaking hands with then-Senator Barak Obama as well as pictures of The Minister hugging members of the Congressional Black Caucus. The Jewish community was so incensed that their anger has exploded across the media world that they control. As a result, the image of Louis Farrakhan has emerged all over the internet, radio, television, and social media. Again, he is being touted as a Black Hitler; the smear campaign against him has been relentless.

But the discerning observer, more familiar with The Minister now than they were in 1984, must ask themselves, Why would a little-known congressman from an obscure district in the Midwest be so concerned about the leading Black voice in America? Rokita’s 4th congressional district has a population of almost 730,000 people, of whom only 3.3% are Black. An article written by Jeffrey Blankfort and the words of Ariel Sharon may help put this issue in perspective.

Jeffrey Blankfort is a Jewish anti-Zionist radio talk show host, a radio program producer for KZYX in Mendocino, and a journalist. In a lengthy exposé published in CounterPunch magazine on September 5, 2016, Blankfort described how the Zionist lobby controls the entire Black political establishment. The article, titled “Congressional Black Caucus: Deep in the Israel Lobby’s Pocket,” details how the Congressional Black Caucus’s political parameters are controlled by the Jews. Further, on October 3, 2001, the BBC reported Ariel Sharon, the former Minister of Defense and former Prime Minister of Israel, proudly boasted: “ I want to tell you something very clear: Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people control America and the American people know it.” Evidently Congressman Rokita knows it also.

Jude Wanniski with Minister Louis Farrakhan

Slavishly doing the bidding of his Jewish masters, Rokita is sponsoring a Congressional resolution condemning any politician taking a picture, dining, or talking with his own people in the political arena. Some Jews such as Alan Dershowitz, for example, have become so apoplectic that they have threatened to abandon the Democratic Party if Keith Ellison, a Black Muslim member of Congress, were elected to the chairmanship of the DNC. This corrosive bigotry was applied to Black elected members of Congress for their informal association with Farrakhan—and for just being in the same room with him. That corrosive bigotry, however, does not apply to White politicians and their surrogates. White politicians are given a “mulligan” when it comes to dining, planning, talking, and meeting with the man whose organizing genius resulted in calling four marches in Washington, D.C., where over four million members of the human family gathered together to celebrate their humanity. Members of the orthodox rabbinic community appeared at one of those gatherings and actually bowed to The Minister and later referred to him as the Messiah.

However, Rokita and the wily Jews who control him forgot to hold White politicians to the same Farrakhan Litmus Test. A personal friend of Minister Farrakhan, former associate editor of the Wall Street Journal, the late Jude Wanniski, invited The Minister to speak to the leaders of the Republican Party and Republican opinion-makers at Wanniski’s 13th annual gathering of Republican executives and investors, sponsored by the supply-side consultant at his Polyconomics Conference. The participants of this Republican economics think-tank did not consider Farrakhan an untouchable. Not only did they give him a standing ovation, the assembled leadership took turns shaking his hand and sought private meetings with him as well. The 1997 gathering of the Republican brain trust included Senator John Ashcroft, Representative John Kasich (now Governor of Ohio and potential presidential candidate), the former vice-presidential nominee Jack Kemp, and Robert Novak, noted syndicated columnist, journalist, television personality, author, and conservative political commentator.

John Kasich

Among the noted Democrats at the Boca Raton meeting were Senator Chris Dodd and UN Ambassador and former Governor of New Mexico, Bill Richardson; representing the international community was the Chinese Ambassador to the U.S. Li Daoyu.

The Republicans were enamored of Farrakhan. In a private meeting I had with Jack Kemp in New York City in 1995, Kemp said of Minister Farrakhan’s Million Man March speech, “I could have given that speech.” Kemp was not the only Republican leader who was enamored with and captivated by Farrakhan. Robert Novak, in an article he wrote in the Washington Post on March 6, 1997, titled “Farrakhan and the GOP,” spoke of the respect then-Rep. John Kasich had for Farrakhan. Speaking of the kind regards The Minister had for Rep. Kasich he wrote, “Kasich was startled when his speech here to a closed-door audience was interrupted several times by standing applause from the Nation of Islam leader. As they shook hands afterward, the congressman was floored by Farrakhan’s kind words.” Novak ended his article by saying, “But if they ever got together, the political landscape would be transformed.” That speech was buffered by an invigorating interview Novak had with Farrakhan on his CNN television program, Evans and Novak.

Jack Kemp

Robert Novak

Wanniski reports on his website, Polyconomics, on March 4, 1997, that The Minister spoke for 50 minutes on Saturday morning, and answered questions for another 45 minutes. Wanniski wrote: “The applause he [Farrakhan] received was the most sustained in the history of these events. Of the several Jewish couples in attendance, there was uniform agreement on what I have been advising for the last several months—that he seems a more complex and likeable man than they expected.” After the large group meeting Farrakhan then held small one-on-one meetings with the assembled leaders.

Mr. Rokita would be well advised to study the lessons his Republican predecessors learned from their dialogue with The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan. The ill-advised methodology he is employing at the behest of The Minister’s detractors will end up as an exercise of fruitless utility. Instead of serving as an obstructionist, Rokita could serve as a broker. He should take the advice of Mr. Wanniski and facilitate a dialogue between The Honorable Minister Farrakhan and the Jewish leadership, or bring The Minister before Congress and let him dialogue with the country’s political leadership and have them talk together as intelligent adults.

By Brother Jackie Muhammad. He can be reached by email at jacrb519 [at]




ADL Tweets Honored Two Men Who Sound Just Like Farrakhan!

Both of the ADL’s Black History Month Tweets Honored
Two Men Who Sound Like Farrakhan!

The ONLY TWO Black History Month 2018 tweets by the ADL’s Jonathan Greenblatt honored two men whose religious views are far more aligned with Farrakhan’s than with the ADL’s. If he knew what they REALLY believed Greenblatt would call Frederick Douglass and W.E.B. Du Bois “haters” and “anti-Semites”:



“Between the Christianity of this land and the Christianity of Christ, I recognize the widest possible difference—so wide that to receive the one as good, pure, and holy, is of necessity to reject the other as bad, corrupt, and wicked. To be the friend of the one is of necessity to be the enemy of the other. I love the pure, peaceable, and impartial Christianity of Christ; I therefore hate the corrupt, slave-holding, women-whipping, cradle-plundering, partial and hypocritical Christianity of this land. Indeed, I can see no reason but the most deceitful one for calling the religion of this land Christianity…”

W.E.B. Du Bois

The erudite Du Bois devoted nearly all of his 95 years to the uplift of Black people. While in Georgia he surveyed the businesses, mills, and factories and came to a startling conclusion: “The Jew is the heir of the slave-baron.” He spoke of the exploitation of Blacks by the “shrewd and unscrupulous Jews” and penned what was one of the first written eyewitness testimonies describing the true exploitative nature of the Black–Jewish relationship.

When Du Bois published these observations in a book called The Souls of Black Folks, he was called an “anti-Semite,” but a government study confirmed that Du Bois was spot on. The report revealed that in the middle of Black Georgia, “Nine-tenths of the storekeepers in Dougherty County are Jewish merchants—some Russian and German Jews, but most of them Polish Jews.”

Prominent Jews then pressured Du Bois to change the word “Jew” to “foreigner” or “immigrant.” They didn’t deny the truth of his observation, but demanded that he conceal this critical Jewish role from his Black readers. Even today one can find copies of the book with these sleight-of-hand variations of the original words. Read more in The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews.

Newly UNCOVERED Photo Reveals Farrakhan Meeting Reagan, Bush

Jewish List of “anti-Semites” Just Got Much Longer and Much Whiter


In 2018, the Jewish leadership stepped up their racist campaign to destroy the reputations of Black leaders who no longer accept the political manipulations of Jewish money. It started many years ago, but the latest incarnation began with the recent publication of a 2005 photograph taken by journalist Askia Muhammad showing Senator Barack Obama happily posing for a photo with The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan. Arrogant and overreaching, Jews demanded to know why they hadn’t been told of the photo, suggesting that knowledge of it would have changed the course of American history and even doomed the chance to elect Obama as the first Black president.

2005 photo by Askia Muhammad

Soon Jews feigning outrage demanded lists of ALL shvartses (Jewish term for “niggers”) who had EVER had photos taken with The Honorable Minister. Rep. Keith Ellison was thought to have been in a room with him and he was pilloried. Members of the Congressional Black Caucus were photographed hugging Black America’s most respected and admired leader, and ALL 21 of them were publicly whipped, their names plastered all over the Jewish-controlled media. It began to look like one of the many Jewish slave-auction advertisements that were so common when they dominated the slave trade for 400 years[1]. (See, for example, Rabbi Levin selling “22 Likely Negroes at Auction.”)

Ad placed by slave-selling Rabbi Levin

So Jewish leaders, in their utter madness, have established an absurd criterion they demand Blacks comply with: ANYBODY who has been in a room with The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan MUST be condemned, disgraced, and lose their jobs. And it escapes no one’s notice that ALL of their targets are Black—none are white. Driving the Jewish onslaught are such con artists as “lawyer” Alan Dershowitz, the ADL’s spymaster[2] Jonathan Greenblatt, political hack Ari Fleischer, and news actor Jake Tapper. How unsurprising that all of their megaphones fell silent at the exposure of a photo that Jews have been keeping secret for more than 20 years! The photograph shows The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan as a guest at the White House in Washington, DC, at the invitation of the father of the modern REPUBLICAN PARTY, President Ronald Wilson Reagan!

Several photographs were taken of the January 4, 1984, event, which was a celebration of the release of navy pilot Lt. Robert Goodman, a Black man who had been shot down flying a bombing mission over Syria. The Rev. Jesse Jackson, while in the midst of his historic campaign for the presidency, brought a delegation with him to Syria to appeal to President Hafez Al-Assad to release the pilot on humanitarian grounds. And several of those in that delegation attested to The Minister’s “significant and vital role” in freeing the prisoner of war. Chicago attorney Thomas N. Todd said that Minister Farrakhan was a “substantial part of the success” of Mr. Jackson’s Syria mission.[3]

So Farrakhan was not simply at the White House as some bystander: he had actually carried out American foreign policy where the United States government had failed its own captured officer.

Now, back to the Jews, who played no role in saving our brother’s life, but an immense role in attacking both Jackson and Farrakhan: Their list of damnable “anti-Semites” who have met with Farrakhan has now been substantially whitened, and now includes two “anti-Semitic” presidents!

Ronald W. Reagan

George H. W. Bush, future president

Edwin Meese, Counselor to the President

Caspar Weinberger, Secretary of Defense

James Baker, Chief of Staff

John Poindexter, National Security Council staffer

David Gergen, Assistant for Communications

George Shultz, Secretary of State


All of those white men met and shook hands with, thanked, and congratulated The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan.

The Jewish language is clear and unconditional about such “Farrakhan photo felons” when they are Black. Greenblatt saw the Obama photo, and even though Obama, as senator, had previously “denounced the bigotry of Farrakhan,” the Jewish attack dog commanded that former President Obama “do so again.” The ADL’s top bigot said of Rep. Danny Davis, D-Ill., “It is unfortunate that the congressman apparently can’t muster up the courage to denounce Farrakhan…” Referring to Keith Ellison’s meeting with Farrakhan, David Bernstein, the president of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, said on Twitter, “It’s very disturbing….Dining with hatemongers is not ok.” The ridiculous Alan Dershowitz blathered that that Obama–Farrakhan photo was “a really horrible truth,” and former White House press secretary Ari Fleischer tweeted what amounted to a 21st-century runaway slave advertisement: “Here are 21 members of Congress today who belonged to the CDC in 2005. Why not ask them if meeting with anti-Semites is ok?”

Certainly, the publication of this photo of the Reagan–Farrakhan Rose Garden festivities has proved that two white presidents have crossed that Jewish line. Former President Bush is still alive and—just like former President Obama—must answer for his “anti-Semitism.” Who will get to him first—Greenblatt, Dershowitz, Bernstein, or Fleischer?

The answer, of course, is that all these Jewish hypocrites will prove for the millionth time that the Jewish leadership are some of America’s most accomplished racists. They and we know that the charge of “anti-Semitism” is nothing more than a historical hatchet to “justify” their true racist aims. They have avoided supporting real liberation movements by inventing “anti-Semitism” where none exists and then creating a fake outrage around that false charge. They are a one-trick pony and the tactic as an effective bludgeon against their enemies has run its course. In The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, Vol. 2, Jewish scholar Marc Dollinger explains why Jewish leaders chose to use this tactic against the Nation of Islam:

“Despite the Nation of Islam’s political marginalization, [Jews] still feared [Elijah] Muhammad. His charismatic personality, willingness to confront racism in the most dramatic rhetorical terms and ability to inspire even non-believing African American listeners concerned Jewish leaders. The Nation of Islam leader, they feared, could earn the respect of his black audiences, even if they chose not to join his movement.”

Amazingly, Dollinger does not claim that Mr. Muhammad or the NOI evidenced any form of “anti-Semitism”—he says that the Jewish leaders “feared” the Hon. Elijah Muhammad’s “willingness to confront racism”! Jewish organizations, then, worked tirelessly against the NOI— an organization they knew was not anti-Jewishto STOP THE BLACK MUSLIMS FROM CONFRONTING RACISM! And this destructive, anti-Black policy—described by Dollinger—is how Jews in America have thoroughly earned the title “Synagogue of Satan.”

Your Jewish “friends” Greenblatt, Dershowitz, Bernstein, and Fleischer will run like Ussain Bolt to hide from that ugly truth. It is time for Blacks to finally free themselves from this historical deception and these incorrigible deceivers, lest we fall for their tricks yet again.


Nation of Islam International representative Abdul Akbar Muhammad shaking hands with President Ronald Reagan.


Jet Magazine cover, January 23, 1984.


[1] Jews & Slavery: Lecture by Dr. Leonard E. Barrett, Sr. <>;



Racist Jews and their Attacks on Black leaders

By the standards established by the contemptible Jewish leadership, all those who ever attended any meeting in the presence of The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan must be condemned, repudiated, and suffer the loss of their reputations and their jobs. Curiously, those who have been targeted in these recent Jewish attacks are ALL BLACK: Barack Obama, Rep. Keith Ellison, Rep. Maxine Waters, and several Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) members—but no whites.

Yet at a single meeting in 1998, Minister Farrakhan gave the Anti-Defamation League a whole lot of work to do. Farrakhan was one of over two hundred guests at a gala held by the Jewish-owned Time magazine, and nearly all of the guests were prominent white people. So, ADL, let the condemnations begin. You may wish to start with the two presidents who were there, Donald Trump and Bill Clinton; or with the high government officials Jack Kemp, John Glenn, Ted Kennedy, Hillary Clinton, and William Westmoreland; or media figures Wolf Blitzer, Walter Cronkite, Roone Arledge, Ben Bradlee, Peter Jennings, Tom Brokaw, Dan Rather, Carl Bernstein, Mike Wallace, and Barbara Walters; or with business leaders Steve Jobs and Bill Gates; or with Christian preachers Jerry Falwell and Billy Graham. In fact, when the Reverend Graham saw Minister Farrakhan, he ran over to hug and kiss the Muslim leader.

But, racist Jews, you can’t stop there. At least 70 of the Farrakhan-meeting-attending luminaries were Jewish, including Henry Kissinger, Sidney Blumenthal, Steven Spielberg, Jeffrey Katzenberg, and even “Holocaust survivor” Elie Wiesel. Yes, Elie “never again” Wiesel met with The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan!

It is time for Black leaders who have silently suffered this ludicrous Jewish onslaught to hold their Jewish “best friends” to the very same Jewish standards they have so rudely applied to Blacks alone. This “new” evidence shows that when the unscrupulous Hillary Clinton turned to presidential candidate Barack Obama in 2008 and demanded he condemn Farrakhan, Barack could have easily told her, “You met with Farrakhan too,” and ended that nonsense right then and there. But fear and trepidation of Jewish reprisals are a greater influence on most elected Black leaders than the needs of their oppressed Black constituents.

And let us be clear about how cynical these satanic gangsters are. Black leaders should check their calendars. The Jewish Star’s Jeff Dunetz noted the silence of the Congressional Black Caucus on Trump’s decision to relocate the U.S. Embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. He wrote, “perhaps because around the same time as the Jerusalem announcement, pictures of many of their member smiling alongside famous anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan was released [sic].”[1]

And thus we have the reason why a 2005 meeting of Black people has become “news” thirteen years later in 2018. As the Mossad’s motto explains, “By Way of Deception, Thou Shalt Do War.”

So the attacks on Black politicians and Min. Farrakhan have nothing to do with “anti-Semitism.” And to prove it, let us see if these selectively offended Jews will be so quick to condemn Elie Wiesel, Henry Kissinger, and Steven Spielberg as they are Barack Obama, Keith Ellison, and Maxine Waters. The responses of the ADL’s Jonathan Greenblatt, and his shills Alan Dershowitz and Jake Tapper, will prove definitively whether or not the Jews have changed their ways since their centuries of slave dealing, racist violence, and exploitation of Black people.

Don’t hold your breath.



Full List of Time Magazine’s 75th anniversary party held March 3, 1998, at New York City’s Radio City Music Hall with guest Minister Louis Farrakhan:

Lamar Alexander

Muhammad Ali

Kurt Andersen

Terry Anderson

Kofi Annan

Roone Arledge

Ken Auletta

Lauren Bacall

Lee Bailey

Anne Bancroft

Roger Bannister

Jill Barad

Dr. Christiaan Barnard

Carl Bernstein

Wolf Blitzer

Sidney Blumenthal

Reginald K. Brack Jr.

Ben Bradlee

Bill Bradley

William J. Bratton

Steven Brill

Phil Bronstein

Tom Brokaw

James L. Brooks

Mel Brooks

Tina Brown

Don Budge

Joseph Califano

Kate Capshaw

Steve Case

Carol Channing

Julia Child

Bill Clinton

Hillary Clinton

Jennet Conant

Sean Connery

Joan Ganz Cooney

Arthur Cooper

David Copperfield

Kevin Costner

Patricia Nixon Cox

Walter Cronkite

Tom Cruise

Michael Deaver

Dr. Michael E. DeBakey

Barry Diller

Joe DiMaggio

Dominick Dunne

Ahmet Ertegun

Mica Ertegun

Harry Evans

James Fallows

Jerry Falwell

Joe Ferrer

Kelly Flinn

Jodie Foster

Nancy Friday

Betty Friedan

David Frost

James R. Gaines

Bill Gates

Frank Gifford

Kathie Lee Gifford

William Ginsburg

John Glenn

Mikhail Gorbachev

Raisa Gorbachev

Billy Graham

Andrew Grove

Henry A. Grunwald

Bryant Gumbel

Bruce Hallett

Dorothy Hamill

Tom Hanks

Valerie Harper

Don Hewitt

Andrew Heyward

Anita Hill

Dr. David Ho

Richard Holbrooke

Evander Holyfield

John Huey

Lee Iacocca

John Irving

Walter Isaacson

Ann Jackson

Judith Jamison

Mort Janklow

Peter Jennings

Steve Jobs

Tom Johnson

Lanny Jones

Star Jones

Arthur Kaminsky

Peter Kaplan

Jeffrey Katzenberg

James Kelly

Jack Kemp

Caroline Kennedy

Edward Kennedy

John F. Kennedy Jr.

Rory Kennedy

Nancy Kerrigan

Dr. Jack Kevorkian

Nicole Kidman

Val Kilmer

Pat Kingsley

Larry Kirshbaum

Henry Kissinger

Michael J. Klingensmith

Jill Krementz

Steve Kroft

Frank Lalli

Bert Lance

Matt Lauer

Gerald M. Levin

Robert Levine

Marshall Loeb

Don Logan

Dave Long

Sophia Loren

James Lovell

Henry Luce III

Norman Mailer

Terry McDonell

Cynthia McFadden

Jay McInerney

Jason McManus

Robert McNamara

Lisa McRee

Sonny Mehta

Christopher Meigher III

Isaac Mizrahi

Ann Moore

Mary Tyler Moore

Dick Morris

Toni Morrison

Isolde Motley

Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Henry Muller

Ralph Nader

Martha Nelson

Mike Nichols

Chris O’Donnell

Daniel Okrent

Edward James Olmos

Alan J. Pakula

Richard Parsons

Jane Pauley

Norman Pearlstine

Michael Pepe

Joy Philbin

Regis Philbin

George Plimpton

Sally Quinn

Dan Rather

Donna Rice

Leni Riefenstahl

Molly Ringwald

Gil Rogin

Ed Rollins

Sherrie Rollins

Andy Rooney

Mickey Rooney

Charlie Rose

Roger Rosenblatt

Tim Russert

Morley Safer

Robert Safian

Mort Sahl

Diane Sawyer

Claudia Schiffer

Arthur Schlesinger Jr.

Edwin Schlossberg

James W. Seymore Jr.

Joyce Seymore

Bernard Shaw

Peggy Siegal

Liz Smith

Lois Smith

Jerry Solomon

Theodore Sorensen

Mira Sorvino

Steven Spielberg

John Squires

Martha Stewart

Sharon Stone

Kerri Strug

Strobe Talbott

Gay Talese

Nan Talese

Cheryl Tiegs

Laurence Tisch

Calvin Trillin

Garry Trudeau

Donald Trump

Peter Ueberroth

Paul Volcker

Diane von Furstenberg

Mike Wallace

Barbara Walters

Wendy Wasserstein

James Watson

Dr. Andrew Weil

Harvey Weinstein

Raquel Welch

Jann S. Wenner

David Westin

William Westmoreland

Tom Wicker

Elie Wiesel

Jeannie Williams

Rita Wilson

Jeff Zucker




The Honorable Minister LOUIS FARRAKHAN has called for a SHOWDOWN with the forces of Jewish hatred who have forever tormented the Black nation. Those who STAND with our beloved Minister must arm and fortify ourselves with TRUTH and do as the Holy Quran requires in Sura 16:125:

Call to the way of thy Lord with wisdom and goodly exhortation, and argue with them in the best manner. Surely thy Lord knows best him who strays from His path, and He knows best those who go aright.


The Holy Quran

The Holy Bible (KJV)

Acts 18:28 — For he vigorously refuted his Jewish opponents in public debate, proving from the Scriptures that Jesus was the Messiah.


Minister Louis Farrakhan’s Letter To ADL’s Abraham Foxman (June 24, 2010) 


The Minister on Twitter   •    The Minister on Facebook

Jewish INFLUENCE in World Affairs: In Their Own Words (18-page PDF)

Here are Resources for TRUTH WARRIORS who want to gain greater UNDERSTANDING of this CRITICAL Issue—the Black-Jewish Relationship:

Minister Farrakhan and the Jews: What Is the Truth?

Jews Targeted Black Self-Help Long Before Farrakhan

THE SECRET RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BLACKS & JEWS: Highlights and Key Points from three ground-breaking books that must be studied!


Must SEE VIDEO EVIDENCE of Jewish Relationship with their Black SLAVES

The Minister’s DIRECT Words: News Network

The Minister and The Secret Relationship

The Most Honorable Elijah Muhammad wrote in his book Our Saviour Has Arrived (page 177) that Jesus “was actually believing that he could convert the Jews until he learned the history of the Jews. Then he [Jesus] changed his mind and denounced them as being a race of devils…” (See John 8:31ff.) In straight words The Messenger said that Jesus of the New Testament was actually operating under a deception about the Jewish people, until he came into the knowledge of their history, at which point he changed his mind and changed his mission.

Rabbi’s Words Connect Talmud to Anti-Black Violence and Police Killings

The Talmud*: Jewish Hate Teaching:

*An excellent resource for the study of the Talmud is the book Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit, by Michael Hoffman, a former reporter for the New York Bureau of the Associated Press and the author of nine books, including Judaism Discovered and Judaism’s Strange Gods. See his website at

Blacks & Jews News:

Open Letter to Congressman Rokita, R-IN

Why Criticism of Israel (by Americans) Is Legally Impossible

Jews Targeted Black Self-Help Long Before Farrakhan

Starbucks Boycott Spreads After ADL Involvement (April 2018)

Racist Rabbis: A Long Legacy of Jewish Race-Hate

Min. Farrakhan Speaks to Detroit City Council (May 17, 2013)

Joe Biden Declares “IMMENSE” Jewish influence in Hollywood & U.S. Culture


VIDEO: Missing Links (Israeli involvement in 9/11) Devastating Indictment

VIDEO: Architects & Engineers – Solving the Mystery of WTC




 The Minister was attacked for saying that 9/11 was an Israeli operation. Scholars say he is 100% ACCURATE:

ex-US Marine/Gulf War veteran Ken O’Keefe:


The Truth about the Talmud




ENOUGH! Is EVERY Black Person AN ‘Anti-Semite’?



Micha Sify on Anti-Semitism (The Nation, Jan. 25, 1993)


What Do We Do About the 
Unrelenting Jewish Hate? Pt.1  —  PART 2, Tingba Muhammad

Science PROVES the NOI Teaching on YAKUB, NOI Research Group








Dr. Tony Martin Attacked at Wellesley College (A True Warrior Scholar Backs The Secret Relationship)